Feedback Sheet – Student Work
Name of product
|
What I thought were the strengths
|
What I thought were the weaknesses
|
‘ROCKHOUND’
|
All of the images that they have used are original and are of good
quality. They have used effects (black and white) on some of the images to
make it look more professional. A good variety of colour has been used
throughout the magazine however they have still managed to maintain a red,
black and white colour scheme. The
Font on the front cover is large, capitalised and bold immediately catching
the audience’s attention. The layouts of all of the pages are very different
to any other magazine showing originality.
|
The font used for the Masthead is not very suitable; I was unable to
recognise what it said. All of the text is in different fonts and different
colours making it confusing and unable to read. The white text
at the bottom of the Front cover is positioned on top of a stripy black and
yellow background making it difficult to read. |
|
All of the images that they have used are original; some of them are
of good quality and have been cropped well. Some have special effects on and
some are just natural making them look more professional. The magazine is
very colourful with a clear red, pink, black and white theme. On the Front cover all of the headings of the
artists are in the same font and the subheadings below are also in the same
font showing similarity. The name of the magazine is very original and looks
very affective.
|
The smaller images on the contents page are of very bad quality and are
very dark and unrecognisable, they have been squished to fit in a certain box
which has distorted the image and made it unable to see it very well. Although
the name of the magazine is original, it isn’t particularly clear as to what
the magazine is actually called; this could impact negatively on its sales.
|
‘TMR’
|
The main image on the front cover and the double page spread is
original and is of good quality. There is a clear Red, Blue, white and Black
colour scheme on the Front cover and Contents page and the text is bold and
stands out. The title of the magazine is slightly covered by the main image
however it is still recognisable.
|
Many of the images on the contents page and some on the Front cover
are not original and aren’t very good quality. All of text on the Front cover
is in different fonts which looks quite unprofessional. The double page
spread has no colour similarity to the front cover and content page and is
quite dull.
|
‘I.D’
|
Some of the images are original, all of the images on the Content
page are extremely good quality. The content page looks very professional and
there is a clear black and white colour scheme on the Front Cover and
Contents page. The way the double page
spread is set out is very traditional in the magazine world, dedicating an
entire page with an image and the other page to text. The way the ‘I.D’ card
has been cropped into the image is very unique. The double page spread has a clear Orange
and White colour scheme.
|
The main image on the Front cover and the image in the ‘I.D’ card are
of very bad quality. Most of the images on the Content page are not original and
look slightly over crowded. The white text on orange background on the double
page spread does not stand out as much as the white text on black background
on the front cover and Contents page.
|
